PRESENTATION

Presentation

This is an unusual presentation, since I write it when the blog has already been running for two weeks and after several posts have been published. I start this blog with a critical review of the facts surrounding allegations of sexual abuse against Woody Allen. I don’t know if I’ll want to try other things in the future or not. Nor do I know if I’ll have the same judgements on this subject when this adventure ends as when I started the publication. Although anyone who examines the blog entries can verify that my assessment of the facts is overwhelmingly in favor of Allen's innocence, I am open to examine any new evidence that may arise or that may change my judgement if the critical analysis of well-known facts or new revelations require it. So far, however, the more I look into the facts, the clearer I find his innocence.

I will try to use independent sources and, above all, sources contrary to Allen’s interests as foundation of my arguments and analyses: the little we know about judicial declarations; the judicial rulings that are known (which are not all); the reports we know something (very little) about; Mia Farrow's autobiography; the memoirs of her babysitter and principal witness, Kristy Groteke; and the prosecution document announcing that no criminal action against Allen would be taken. I will also resort to the statements of Moses Farrow, privileged witness of everything that happened, which, beyond his personal tragedy, raise some questions that need elucidation.

If any of you want to contribute anything, or do not feel convinced by any of my arguments, or feel that I overlooked essential facts, please feel free to make use of the comments. Any form of civilized discussion of facts and arguments will be welcomed. Those who seek a different form of discussion don’t need to come here.

Bienvenidos a casa de Nadie. 


LA CONDUCTA INADECUADA DE WOODY ALLEN EN LA SENTENCIA DE WILK Y APELACION
WHAT EVIDENCE OF THE JUDGMENT OF CUSTODY REFERRED FRAN MACO BY SAYING THAT IT HAD NO PROBATORY FORCE?

A FIRST APPROACH TO JUDGE WILK'S DECISION THAT DOESN´T LOOK LIKE WHAT YOU USUALLY READ

THE SUPPOSED AND IMPROBABLE REFUTATION THAT JESSICA WINTER MAKES OF BOB WEIDE

THE TESTIMONY OF DYLAN FARROW

If you want to know more about what happened on August 4, 1993

ITHE DECISION OF THE PROSECUTOR OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT, FRAN MACO, NOT TO INITIATE A PENAL PROCEDURE AGAINST ALLEN FOR THE ALLEGED ABUSES TO DYLAN FARROW

SOME CAVEATS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF DYLAN'S STATEMENTS. CONNECTICUT POLICE INTERVIEWED HER FOR WEEKS USING HIGHLY BIASED TECHNIQUES

RE-UPDATED THE TRUTH ABOUT THE TEN "UNDENIABLE FACTS" OF VANITY FAIR IN RELATION TO THE ALLEGATION OF SEXUAL ABUSE OF DYLAN FARROW AGAINST WOODY ALLEN.

PRESENTATION

Ronan Farrow's memory

A DEEPER LOOK AT THE TESTIMONY OF THE THREE NANNIES.